#X4500mhd movie
#X4500mhd 1080p
#X4500mhd drivers
#X4500mhd upgrade

And what is there to know about mac anyway? RUMOR RUMORS RUMORS, being a mac'enthusiast' is all about how much shit you can talk, how many rumors you can start, and how hard you would suck steve jobs cock if he put it in your mouth.ДЇlash, is a fabulous technology that makes 10 million different things possible on the web that would NOT HAPPEN without it. Hello ANANDTECH, did you know that 95% of the worlds computers still use windows? Probably not, which is why you put an article like this using a MAC, on a website 90% dedicated to PC hardware.

modulo - Tuesday, Malink This article makes ANANDTECH, look like a bunch of apple swilling morons.

We expect this is one of those areas Adobe will work on during the next couple of months prior to the official launch of Flash 10.1.

#X4500mhd drivers

Unfortunately, looking around Hulu, the vast majority of their videos appear to have this problem on the GMA 4500MHD.Д¬onsidering the problems we had with ATI video playback and Flash 10.1, the problem appears to be either graphics drivers or incomplete support for non-NVIDIA hardware in Flash 10.1. The anomaly was the Hulu SD video, where we saw CPU usage dropped 10% but frame rates went from a smooth 33 FPS down to 10 FPS.

#X4500mhd movie

Our Hulu HD 720p movie dropped CPU usage by 20%, again with frame rates running at the expected 24 FPS (give or take).

The frame rate also locked in at 24 FPS, which is what you would expect since the source movie is 24 FPS. The good news is that CPU utilization dropped by 11 points on the YouTube 720p video. One oddity worth noting is that frame rates actually tended to be slightly higher than the video content, though it didn't cause any noticeable distortion. The YouTube 720p video we looked at didn't require nearly as much CPU power, and it didn't drop any frames. Both Hulu videos had CPU utilization at above 70%, with spikes hitting 95%. CPU usage was rather high on the 2.1 GHz T6500 processor, but there were no noticeable frame drops. First, we really didn't have any trouble watching any of the videos in full screen mode using Flash 10.0. Things were a bit more interesting on the NV58.

Moving on to the Gateway NV58 with GMA 4500MHD. Needless to say, your typical netbook using an Intel GMA 950 isn't going to be able to do any of this stuff, regardless of which version of Flash you're running. Hulu's 720p Legend of the Seeker (one of their few HD videos at present) ran at a buttery smooth 24 FPS. Average CPU utilization drops by 20 to 35% and every video we tested worked without a hitch (provided we used the &fmt=22 workaround mentioned earlier).

#X4500mhd upgrade

Upgrade to Flash 10.1 and pretty much all of the problems mentioned above are gone. Hulu is even worse, with SD video managing just 7.1 FPS and a 720p video running a 1 FPS slideshow. We averaged around three frames per second on a 30 FPS video.

#X4500mhd 1080p

With YouTube now starting to support 1080p videos, things only get worse.

HD movies range from dropping about one third of the frames to dropping well over half of the frames, and that's at 720p. Standard definition movies on YouTube are about as good as it gets, and there's still obvious frame dropping when running in fullscreen mode. Using Flash 10.0, the ION netbook is horrible for Flash video. I conducted all of the laptop testing with the videos running in fullscreen mode. The difference between Flash 10.0 and 10.1 is absolutely stunning on an ION-based netbook. My results with the ION LE laptop are similar to Anand's experience, except that I didn't have an external display so I used the native 1366x768 laptop LCD. Besides the AMD numbers (ATI HD 3200 using a Gateway NV52 laptop), I also ran tests on an HP Mini 311 (NVIDIA ION LE) and a Gateway NV58 (Intel GMA 4500 MHD). As Anand mentioned, I ran some tests on laptops as a sanity check.